|















|
Annotated Section Indexes
To view an index of report references to
The Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy
Act, (FOIP)
The Local Authority Freedom of Information and
Protection of Privacy Act (LA FOIP) The Health Information Protection Act
(HIPA)
click on the appropriate hyperlink below:
Review Reports
The
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
-
Report F-2008-002 (Ministry
of Justice and Attorney General) – possession or control by a
government institution – ss. 2(1)(d), 5 and 7(2)(e) of FOIP
|
-
Report F-2008-001 (Saskatchewan
Corrections and Public Safety) - adequate search for responsive
records; implied duty to assist; timeliness of response - ss. 7,
13(1)(a), 21 and 29(1) of FOIP and s. 38(1)(a) of HIPA
|
-
Report F-2007-002 (Saskatchewan Government
Insurance) - burden of proof when claiming discretionary
exemptions such as consultation and deliberation and solicitor
client privilege to withhold records - ss. 17(1)(b)(i), 22 and
61 FOIP Act
|
-
Report F-2007-001 (Saskatchewan Northern Affairs) - fee estimate, how
to process fee waiver, each government institution has
responsibility only for records in its possession or under its
control, not for records in other government institutions,
disclosing identity of applicant to the other government
institutions - ss. 9(5), 5, 6, 7, 11, and 24 FOIP Act and
sections 6(2),
7 and 9 FOIP Regulations
|
-
Report F-2006-005 (Saskatchewan
Government Insurance, Saskatchewan Telecommunications,
Saskatchewan Health, Saskatchewan Power Corporation,
Saskatchewan Energy
Incorporated) - extension of time to respond to access requests -
ss. 7 and 12, requirements for proper notice of extension, burden
of proof, extensions inappropriate if public body inadequately
resources FOIP, need for consultations must be particularized,
some limits on outside consultation in order to respond to access
request
|
-
Report F-2006-004 (Saskatchewan Human Rights
Commission) - duty to assist, lawful investigations, consultations
and deliberations - ss. 15(1)(c), 17(1)(b) and 29(2) FOIP Act
|
-
Report F-2006-003 (Saskatchewan Justice) - extension
of 30 days to respond - sufficiency of response under section
7(2)(d) - how to sever under section 8 and how to communicate
reason for severance to applicant
|
-
Report F-2006-002 (Saskatchewan Research Council) -
access request for information on environmental testing of
samples - ss. 13(1)(a), 17(1)(a), 17(2)(c)(i), 18(1)(f), 18(2)(a), and
19(1)(b) FOIP Act
|
-
Report F-2006-001
(Saskatchewan Corrections and Public Safety) - solicitor acting
for applicant - blanket application of discretionary exemptions
- "obtained in confidence" - "with respect to a lawful
investigation" - "personal information" -
ss. 15(1)(c), 13(2), and 29(1) FOIP Act
|
-
Report F-2005-007
(Saskatchewan Government Insurance) - motor vehicle claims
history - definition of personal information - ss. 24, 29(1)
FOIP Act
|
-
Report F-2005-006
(Saskatchewan Liquor and Gaming Authority) - customer
satisfaction survey - right of use - "commercial" - monetary
value - s. 18(1)(b) FOIP Act
|
-
Report F-2005-005 (SaskEnergy Incorporated) - fee
estimate - burden of proof for fee claim - content of fee
estimate - ss.7,8 and 9 FOIP Act
|
-
Report F-2005-004 (Saskatchewan Government
Insurance) - personal injury documents - "consultation" - s.
17(1)(b)(i) FOIP Act
|
-
Report F-2005-003 (Crown Investments Corporation) -
utility bundle records - "reasonable expectation of prejudice"
-- ss.19(1)(b), 19(1)(c)(ii) and 61 FOIP Act
|
-
Report F-2005-002 (Saskatchewan Justice) - litigation documents - no
confirmation whether responsive records exist -- ss. 7(4), 22
FOIP Act
|
-
Report F-2005-001 (Saskatchewan Labour) - industrial accident records -
ss. 24, 29 FOIP Act; s. 2(m) HIPA
|
-
Report F-2004-007 (Saskatchewan Property Management
Corporation) - leased premises and financial records - adequacy
of search - new exemption claim - s. 18(1)(d), (f), 19(1)(c)
FOIP Act
|
-
Report F-2004-006 (Saskatchewan Human Rights
Commission) - investigation file - lawful investigation -
investigation record from another organization - s. 15(1)(c)
FOIP Act
|
-
Report F-2004-005 (Executive Council) - public
opinion survey - duty to assist - s. 7(2)(c), 61 FOIP Act
|
-
Report F-2004-004 (Saskatchewan Industry and
Resources) - budget materials - verbal consent - ss. 16(1)(a),
61, 69 FOIP Act
|
-
Report
F-2004-003 (Saskatchewan Government Insurance) - details
of relapse benefits - duty to assist - purpose of Act - s. 29
FOIP Act
|
-
Report F-2004-002 (Saskatchewan Government Insurance) -
personal injury documents - s. 17(1)(b)(i) FOIP Act
|
|
|
|
The Local Authority Freedom of Information and Protection
of Privacy Act
|
-
Report LA-2009-002 (Regina Qu'Appelle Regional Health
Authority) - duty to assist, “related to administration of an
estate”, information “collected principally in anticipation of,
or for use in, a civil, criminal or quasi-judicial proceeding”,
“advice from officials”, solicitor-client privilege and personal
information of third parties, HIPA sections 2(m), 2(m)(iv),
2(t)(ii), 27(4)(e), 35, 38(1)(d)9iii), 38(1)(e), 46(1),56,56(a)
and LA FOIP sections2(f), 2(f)(xiii), 8, 16(1), 16(1)(a),
16(1)(b), 21, 23, 23(1), 23(1)(b), 23(1)(c), 23(2), 23(3),
27(4)(e)(i), 28(1), 28(2), 43, 49, 49(a), 49(1) and FOIP section
17(1)(b) and LA FOIP Regulations s. 5.
|
- Report LA-2009-001
(The Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation) - what is a “third
party”, “financial, commercial, scientific or technical
information”, LA FOIP sections 18(1)(b), 18(1)(c) and 28(1), 3,
4, 17 and 13(2).
|
-
Report LA-2007-002
(Rural Municipality of Edenwold #158) - property tax information
- material available for purchase by the
public; disclosure of property tax information independent of a
formal request for access - ss. 3(1)(a) and (b), 23 and 28 LA
FOIP
|
-
Report LA-2007-001
(University of Saskatchewan) - discussion of Weidlich v.
SaskPower, treatment of letters of resignation, treatment of
"advice, proposals, recommendations, analyses or policy options"
- ss. 28, 16(1)(a) & (b), 14(1)(d), 17(1)(d) & (f) LA FOIP
|
-
Report
LA-2004-001 (Lloydminster Public School Division) - duty
to assist - transitory records - volunteer or employee - s.
30(2) LA FOIP
|
| |
Health Information Protection Act
|
-
Report H-2009-001 (Regina Qu'Appelle Regional Health
Authority) - duty to assist, “related to administration
of an estate”, information “collected principally in
anticipation of, or for use in, a civil, criminal or
quasi-judicial proceeding”, “advice from officials”,
solicitor-client privilege and personal information of third
parties, HIPA sections 2(m), 2(m)(iv), 2(t)(ii), 27(4)(e), 35,
38(1)(d)9iii), 38(1)(e), 46(1),56,56(a) and LA FOIP
sections2(f), 2(f)(xiii), 8, 16(1), 16(1)(a), 16(1)(b), 21, 23,
23(1), 23(1)(b), 23(1)(c), 23(2), 23(3), 27(4)(e)(i), 28(1),
28(2), 43, 49, 49(a), 49(1) and FOIP section 17(1)(b) and LA
FOIP Regulations s. 5.
|
- Report H-2008-002 (Dr.
Val Mary Harding, Harding Psychological Services, Lebell &
Associates) – access to independent medical examination report
and other personal health information; reasonable expectation of
harm; disclosure of identity of a confidential source;
contracting out of HIPA; need for trustee to have policies and
procedures for HIPA compliance – ss. 2(m),(t) and (u), 6, 16,
38(1)(a), 38(1)(c), 47 and 64(1)(e) HIPA
|
- Report H-2008-001 (Saskatoon Regional Health Authority) –
request for access, duty to assist, inadequacy of trustee’s
response, paramountcy with The Mental Health Services Act
-
ss. 7, 10, 20, 22, 28 LA FOIP; ss. 4(4) , 35(1), 36(1) and (3),
38(1)(a), 39 HIPA
|
- Report H-2007-001 (Saskatchewan Cancer Agency) – denial of patient’s access
request; “…could reasonably be expected to endanger the
mental or physical health or the safety…” - section 38(1)(a) HIPA
|
-
Report H-2006-001 (Saskatoon Regional Health
Authority) - access to personal health information of deceased
person - Part V and s. 56 HIPA - disclosure under s. 27(4)(e) HIPA
- commentary re: fees.
|
|
Investigation Reports (Breach of Privacy)
The Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
|
-
Investigation Report F-2009-001 (Saskatchewan Workers'
Compensation Board) -- Preliminary questions of whether
complaint was frivolous or vexatious, whether the OIPC required
consent of Complainant and whether OIPC investigation can
co-exist with a civil action; disclosure of personal information
without consent or authority; duty to ensure personal
information is accurate and complete; whether FOIP is paramount
to The Workers’ Compensation Act. FOIP sections 2(2), 3,
4(a), 4(b), 23, 26, 26(3), 27, 28, 29, 29(2)(a), 31, 33, 50(2),
59, 59(e); HIPA sections 4(4) and 4(b) and The Workers’
Compensation Act, sections 171, 171(1), 171.1 and 171.2 and
The Interpretation Act, section 10.
|
-
Investigation Report F-2007-001 (Saskatchewan
Workers’ Compensation Board) – Disclosure of personal
information (pi) and personal health information (phi) to
worker’s employer; failure to adequately safeguard pi and phi
when it was sent by ordinary mail; policies and procedures to
conform to section 16 of HIPA; non-compliance with
Overarching Personal Information Privacy Framework for Executive
Government; HIPA sections 2(h), 2(m), 2(t)(i), 4(4), 4(6),
9, 10, 16, 25, 27(3)(b), 27(4)(e)(ii)(B), 42(1)(c) and 52; FOIP
sections 2(1)(d)(i), 2(1)(e), 8, 21, 23(3), 24, 25, 26, 27, 28,
29, 30, 31, 32,33(d) and 60. FOIP Regulations s. 4
|
|
The
Local Authority Freedom of Information and Protection
of Privacy Act
|
|
Health Information Protection Act
|
-
Investigation Report H-2007-001 (Saskatchewan
Health) – Unsealed or improperly sealed envelopes containing
personal health information. Adequate safeguards, how to
respond to a privacy breach complaint, and root cause analysis
of breach complaint - ss. 2(1)(d)(i), 24(1), 33(d) FOIP and ss.
2(j), 2(m), 2(t)(i), 4(4)(g.1), 16, 18, 42(1)(c), 52(d) HIPA
|
-
Investigation Report F-2007-001 (Saskatchewan
Workers’ Compensation Board) – Disclosure of personal
information (pi) and personal health information (phi) to
worker’s employer; failure to adequately safeguard pi and phi
when it was sent by ordinary mail; policies and procedures to
conform to section 16 of HIPA; non-compliance with
Overarching Personal Information Privacy Framework for Executive
Government; HIPA sections 2(h), 2(m), 2(t)(i), 4(4), 4(6),
9, 10, 16, 25, 27(3)(b), 27(4)(e)(ii)(B), 42(1)(c) and 52; FOIP
sections 2(1)(d)(i), 2(1)(e), 8, 21, 23(3), 24, 25, 26, 27, 28,
29, 30, 31, 32,33(d) and 60. FOIP Regulations s. 4
|
|
|
|
|
Web Site last updated
January 04, 2010 |
|